Monday 4 August 2008

Salman Rushdie

"Author Salman Rushdie has threatened to sue a publisher over a book by a former bodyguard that he said portrays him as cheap, nasty and arrogant and depicts his police guards as "losers" who drank on duty."
- http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,396526,00.html

I guess some people don't like being betrayed as things that they believe they aren't. Lawsuits must be the way to go.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Satanic_Verses_controversy

Maybe someone can help point out the difference here? What goes around comes around I guess.

3 comments:

A Global Citizen said...

What goes around certainly comes around!

Isn't this simply a freedom of speech? Isn't this what Rushdie himself has defended and bragged about for years and years when he wrote his rubbish of The Satanic Verses in which he insulted people's faith and sentiments? What's with the double-standards now? Is he giving up on his so-called "profound beliefs", or did he simply think that he was the only one entitled to practice that "right of free speech"? This is simply ironic.

Rushide believed that the end does actually justify the means. He aimed at gaining the acceptance, support and admiration of the West through ridiculing Muslims' faith, and he obviously succeeded in that. Otherwise, he wouldn't have been granted the knighthood by the Queen of England.

Rushdie is nothing but a foul hypocrite whose evil intentions and motivations were far beyond "protecting the freedom of speech".

Khadija said...

I hadn't heard of this... the irony of it all!

The Queen said...

The man is a fiction writer. He never made a statement that the book was anything but fiction and there is nothing wrong with that.

Personal slander on a real, live human being is a completely different story. Especially if the person is making money on telling the lies and trying to ruin a person.